Legal Dispute Between Napster and Photographer Over Sugar Minott Photo

Streaming giant Napster has found itself embroiled in a legal battle with British photographer Adrian Boot over a decades-old photo featuring reggae icon Sugar Minott. Boot alleges copyright infringement, asserting that Napster used the image without proper licensing. However, Napster contends that it acquired the necessary rights through the record label that provided the accompanying recording.

Napster’s defense hinges on the argument that they had a valid license obtained from the record label responsible for the album on which the photo appeared. According to Napster, Boot’s claim necessitated exhaustive research into distribution agreements spanning several decades, ultimately revealing that Boot had already been compensated for the use of his photograph in Minott’s album artwork.

This legal showdown brings to light broader questions regarding the licensing practices of record labels concerning artwork images and their subsequent use by digital platforms. It raises concerns about the formalization of agreements between labels and photographers, and the extent to which labels ensure that they possess the requisite rights to authorize digital platforms to use these images.

At the heart of the dispute is a photograph taken in 1979, which Soul Jazz Records licensed in 2005 for the album artwork of ‘Sugar Minott At Studio One’. The album, including the contentious photograph, was subsequently delivered to Napster by the label’s distributor, PIAS.

As the case unfolds, it underscores the complexities of navigating intellectual property rights in the digital age, prompting reflection on the adequacy of existing legal frameworks in safeguarding the interests of content creators and digital platforms alike.

For more music industry news, click here.

To start your FREE trial of VELCOA, click here.


Be the first to discover new updates from VELCOA.